Green Salad
 

health & nutrition


the following request went to Vegetarian Society members in February 2000, the initial report is below.

Volunteers needed for study: faecal spread of antibiotic resistant bacteria

Jon Caplin of the Environment & Public Health Research Unit at the University of Brighton has asked us to help him find volunteers for his study of the spread of antibotic-resistant bacteria. They wish to test the hypothesis that these bacteria can spread to the human gastro-intestinal tract from meat products. To do this, they need to examine the stools of meat-eaters, vegetarians and vegans to test for the presence or absence of these bacteria. Volunteers would need to provide one sample of fresh faeces, anonymously. The only information required from volunteers is their age, sex, length of time vegetarian/vegan and whether they ever handle any meat products (eg for non vegetarian family members or as part of their job). Sampling pots, instructions and postage boxes will be provided. If you are interested in taking part in this study, please contact Jon Caplin on 01273 642675, fax: 01273 642285, email: j.l.caplin@bton.ac.uk


Epidemiology and ecology of antibiotic resistant enterococci in the food chain

Background

Enterococci are bacteria that are ubiquitous in the intestinal tract of humans and animals, and are released into the environment from faecal materials and via fertilisers of animal and human origin. They have been isolated in high numbers from plants, soil and water. One important characteristic of this genus of bacteria is their resistance towards chemical and physical stress, and, in contrast to other faecal bacteria that are released into the environment e.g. Escherichia coli enterococci can survive for long periods outside their natural intestinal hosts. There are approximately twenty enterococcal species, the most clinically relevant being E.faecalis and E.faecium, which often exhibit high levels of antibiotic resistance. The enterococci are frequently associated with nosocomial infections (i.e. acquired in the hospital setting) and have been described as "the nosocomial pathogen of the nineties".

Enterococci are often resistant towards most antibiotics in clinical practice, except for the glycopeptide antibiotic vancomycin that has been regarded as the ultimate treatment of enterococcal infections. Recently, strains of enterococci resistant to vancomycin (VRE) have been isolated and, have become increasingly common in European and American hospitals. Recent studies have shown that healthy humans may carry highly vancomycin-resistant enterococci and VRE have also been isolated from farm animals, uncooked meats and poultry, sewage, and, dogs and cats.

Typing of such isolates have shown them to be heterogeneous, belonging to several clones but they all carried the same resistance gene complex, named vanA. It has been shown that humans and animals often carry their own strains of enterococci, leading to a high diversity beyond the species level.

The source of VRE is as yet unknown. Several reports have suggested that the high occurrence of vanA enterococci could be associated with the use of the vancomycin-related glycopeptide avoparcin in animal husbandry as a growth promoter. It has been postulated that avoparcin might have selected for enterococci with high level glycopeptide-resistance, and might thus have increased the reservoir of resistance genes in the environment. However, the spread of VRE from the hospital environment to the food chain has also been suggested to be the origin of these resistance strains. Evidence that's supports the former view is that vancomycin-resistance has not been observed in countries where avoparcin has not been used for many years.

Enterococci also have the ability to exchange genes in vivo, not only with other enterococci, but also with other bacteria, such as Listeria spp., Campylobacter spp. and E.coli. Even though enterococci are not considered as highly pathogenic organisms, the possibility that they may transmit their resistance genes to other, more pathogenic bacteria is worrying. One of the worst scenarios now anticipated is the transfer of the vanA gene to the multi-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), for which vancomycin is regarded as the ultimate treatment - this has already been shown to occur in laboratory experiments.

More knowledge about the epidemiology and ecology of enterococci is required. Within the EU, avoparcin use was recently suspended until further evidence about its possible role in selecting for VRE is gained. However there is still concern that the numbers of VRE will increase. The fear of the dissemination of VRE through the use of fertilisers or composts of animal and human origin could lead to a backlash against modern recycling policies, therefore we need to know more about the fate of enterococci that are spread in the environment through sewage or natural fertilisers such as animal faecal-slurry. Some of the questions as yet unanswered include: can enterococci and VRE be transmitted to humans by the ingestion of vegetables and, by the handling and undercooking of raw meats?; do VRE belong to a few clonal groups or can resistance be transmitted by any enterococcus strain?; do some strains colonise both humans and animals?; can VRE from animals colonise humans?

Programme of Work

Within the framework of the project we will, through a careful typing and resistance determination of a large number of enterococci from different sources, and from different countries within the EU, try to answer the following questions:

  • Are there differences in the population structure (in measures of abundance, number of antibiotic resistant strains, diversity, and stability) among enterococcal populations in areas that have received high amounts of avoparcin and other growth promoting drugs, compared to areas that have not? The question is answered by repeated sampling and characterisation of enterococci from the whole food chain (humans, food, animals, animal manure, animal feed, and the environment) in three different areas within the EC, and by more intensive sampling of humans, animals, and animal carcasses in two other areas.

  • Can we identify certain strains that are transmitted through the food chain, and that survive in the environment particularly well, or do all strains seem to have equal possibility to be spread?

  • Which are the routes of transmission of resistant and normal strains of enterococci between animals, food of animal origin, humans and hospitalised patients? Have antibiotic resistant strains that now are starting to appear among humans outside the hospital environments, evolved due to the antibiotic usage in hospital environments, or have they evolved due to the use of antibiotics and feed additives in agriculture? These aspects will be studied by sampling of large numbers of animals, animal carcasses, humans and hospitalised patients within two areas of the EU, by careful typing of the isolates, and by molecular characterisation of the resistance genes.

  • Is vancomycin (and other antibiotic) resistance a common property, present in a wide variety of species and clones of enterococci, or is it associated only to certain strains of enterococci? This question will be answered by comparing phenotypes (chemical characteristics) and genotypes (genetic characteristics) of resistant and susceptible enterococci of different origin that have been isolated throughout the study.

  • How diverse are the drug resistance genes among the enterococci, and are there differences in transmission ability between different variants of the genes? These questions will be answered by careful typing of the resistance genes from different strains, and by gene transfer experiments of different variants of the resistance genes.

Preliminary Results

  • Presumed enterococci were found in 1148 out of 1527 analysed samples (75%) (at the time of the last project report, in January 1999, we had found enterococci in 421 out of 545 analysed samples (77%)).

  • Presumed enterococcal isolates resistant to 8 mg of Vancomycin have been isolated in 178 out of 1527 samples (11.7%) (in January 1999 it was 57 out of 545 samples (10%)). In most samples vancomycin-resistant enterococci were only found after enrichment in liquid medium containing vancomycin. Most of these isolates have not yet been assayed for resistance towards 20mg/l vancomycin.

  • About 16000 isolates from the project has so far been subject to PhP typing with the PhP-RF plate. Most of these isolates are from non-selective medium, and thus represent the total enterococcal flora in the samples. Other isolates are from antibiotic containing media, and thus represent the resistant flora in the samples. In addition about 4500 enterococcal isolates from related projects have been subject to PhP-typing, and thus our database now consists of data on more than 20000 isolates.

  • PhP types in different kinds of samples have shown (1) a low diversity found among six-day old piglets in the same herd with the sows containing less diverse enterococcal floras, different from those of the piglets. The piglets surprisingly seem to have been colonized by the same type of enterococci as one of those found in the pig feed. (2) A higher diversity found among animals in slaughterhouses. (3) A high diversity in sewage samples, and that the vancomycin and erythromycin resistant isolates seem to be concentrated to a few PhP types. Data from a Swedish study of ampicillin resistant Enterococcus faecium isolates among Swedish hospitalized patients shows that ampicillin resistance is concentrated to a certain PhP type of E.faecium, probably representing a clonal group.

  • Using the PFGE method for genetic fingerprinting, 69 glycopeptide resistant Enterococcus faecium (GRE) isolates from different broiler farms (34) and pig herds (35) in Denmark have been characterised. All isolates from broilers belonged to different PFGE types, whereas the isolates from pigs belonged to closely related PFGE-types, indicating a single clone.

  • A collection of Enterococcus faecalis and Enterococcus faecium isolated from humans in the community (98 and 65 isolates), broilers (126 and 122) and pigs (102 and 88) during 1998 were tested for susceptibility to 18 different antimicrobial agents and for the presence of genes encoding resistance to chloramphenicol, gentamicin, glycopeptides, macrolides, kanamycin/streptomycin, and tetracycline to evaluate the genotypic techniques established.

Conclusions

So far, the project has generated preliminary data on 1527 samples, collected in different geographical regions and from different links of the food chain, as well as a carefully characterised strain collection. The project has also resulted in a co-operatively produced protocol for sampling and analysis of enterococci in the environment and in animals, as well as a culture collection consisting of well characterised isolates from different origins. These isolates represent both normal enterococcal floras in the samples, and the vancomycin resistant floras, and will be a valuable reference material for future investigations.

During the second project year, the main tasks in the project have been sampling and preliminary phenotyping of enterococci (PhP typing), using protocol that was created in during the first project year. The common culture collection of enterococcal strains is in the process of being built up and is maintained at Brighton. Some analysis on the saved isolates have also been imitated (species identification, MIC determination [degree of antibiotic resistance], PFGE typing [genetic fingerprinting]).

Finally the project has so far resulted in the development or adaptation of methods for identification and typing of enterococci, for resistance gene characterisation, and a protocol for MIC determination of enterococci. The project is now more than half-ways through, and a majority of the cumbersome sampling part has been done and a large amount of data has been generated. The work during the third project year will be concentrated on analysis isolates that have been stored in our culture collections (species identification, PFGE typing, MIC determination, characterisation of resistance genes) and on writing up manuscripts and reports.

Jon Caplin
Environment & Public Health Research Unit (EPHRU)
School of the Environment, University of Brighton
Cockcroft Building, Lewes Road, Brighton BN2 4GJ, UK
Tel: +44 (0) 1273 642675 / 642256, Fax: +44 (0) 1273 642285
Email: j.l.caplin@brighton.ac.uk

More information will be available soon on:

http://www.brighton.ac.uk/environment/EC98/